Navigating a higher-yield world
Bond investors' focus shifts to income stability, risk management amid diverging monetary policy
Latest insights
READ THE ARTICLE
Risk and leverage have migrated from corporates and consumers to governments, according to Stephen Snowden, Head of Fixed Income
Are governments riskier than companies?
Previous insights
Embracing flexibility in strategic bonds
AEGON ASSET MANAGEMENT
Active opportunity springs from blooming yields
PGIM INVESTMENTS
Absolute return bond funds: Game over?
ARTEMIS
With rate cuts on the horizon, where next for cash investors?
FIDELITY
From central bank moves and shifting tariff dynamics to tech-driven productivity gains, the economic landscape is evolving fast. PIMCO’s latest Cyclical Outlook explores where risks are intensifying, where opportunities are emerging – and how to position portfolios for the volatile year ahead
Tariffs, technology and transition
The US high-yield market may dwarf its European equivalent when it comes to size, but in terms of opportunities for active managers, it can’t compete
Why it’s not just golf where Europe has the edge over the US
As interest rates rise and volatility persists, Oaktree believe a broader, more dynamic credit landscape helps investors seek income, diversification, and stability in uncertain markets
Credit reimagined: Where income meets opportunity
The Fed’s policy pivot highlights the tension between lingering inflation and buoyant markets, with bonds regaining their edge
Charting market views on interest rates
Oaktree believes that high valuations and market divides are creating selective opportunities across credit
Three insights on today’s diverging markets
RETURN TO HOMEPAGE
Important information FOR PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS AND/OR QUALIFIED INVESTORS AND/OR FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES ONLY. NOT FOR USE WITH OR BY PRIVATE INVESTORS. This is a marketing communication. Before making any final investment decisions, and to understand the investment risks involved, refer to the fund prospectus and KIID/KID, available in English and in your local language (depending on local country registration), from the relevant fund page or literature section on www.artemisfunds.com. The documents can also be found on www.fundinfo.com. CAPITAL AT RISK. All financial investments involve taking risk and the value of your investment may go down as well as up. This means your investment is not guaranteed and you may not get back as much as you put in. Any income from the investment is also likely to vary and cannot be guaranteed. Investment in a fund concerns the acquisition of units/shares in the fund and not in the underlying assets of the fund. The fund is a sub-fund of Artemis Investment Funds ICVC. For further information, visit www.artemisfunds.com/oeic. Any research and analysis in this communication has been obtained by Artemis for its own use. Although this communication is based on sources of information that Artemis believes to be reliable, no guarantee is given as to its accuracy or completeness. Reference to specific shares or companies should not be taken as advice or a recommendation to invest in them. Third parties (including FTSE and MSCI) whose data may be included in this document do not accept any liability for errors or omissions. For information, visit www.artemisfunds.com/third-party-data. Any forward-looking statements are based on Artemis’ current expectations and projections and are subject to change without notice. Issued by Artemis Fund Managers Ltd which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Find out more about the Artemis Strategic Bond Fund
Sources 1. CNBC as at 2 Oct 2025. 2. Office for National Statistics, 17 Sep 2025. Consumer Prices Inflation (CPI) rose 3.8% over the 12 months to 31 Aug 2025. 3. Bloomberg as at 1 Sep 2025.
Leverage has moved from corporates and consumers to governments
Source: 1. Federal Reserve, Artemis as at 1 Jul 2024. 2. Bloomberg as at 31 Dec 2024. 3. Bloomberg, IMF, OBR. Actual data as at 31 December 2023. OBR forecasts as at 31 October 2024 for 2024 to 2028.
4.0%
3.5%
3.0%
2.5%
2.0%
1.5%
1.0%
0.5%
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2018
2020
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
2017
Corporates
Government
US: interest as a % of GDP
1
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
Debt service ratio (%)
Household debt service ratios
US
Great Britain
Germany
2
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
2006
2008
2026
2028
Debt as % of GDP
Government debt/GDP
UK
3
The upshot of all this is that gilts are now attractively valued and their higher yields are attracting a lot of attention from retail investors. Indeed, popular investment platforms such as Hargreaves Lansdown, AJ Bell and interactive investor are reporting record demand for gilts. It’s not all that surprising. With inflation at 3.8% and 30-year gilts offering yields of 5.5%, it’s easy to see why gilts have such a strong appeal – and for direct investors those gains can be tax-free. Markets are currently pricing the Bank of England base rate to be around 3.6% by the middle of next year. Falling interest rates should be supportive for bond markets, especially at the long end of the curve, so there’s potential for some capital uplift too.
Pre-Budget jitters aside, I don’t wish to talk down the UK economy, which my colleagues and I believe is in reasonable shape. It’s the government with the debt problem, not the consumer. Overall, consumer savings are incredibly high and debt relatively low. Companies have also been deleveraging – paying down their debt and issuing bonds at a much shorter maturity than historically. In other words, consumers and companies appear to have much stronger balance sheets than governments.
This makes investment-grade corporate bonds comparatively more appealing than government debt, in my view. For corporate bonds, the technical backdrop looks strong, net issuance is falling, default rates are low and although current spread levels are historically tight, all-in yields remain attractive. History suggests that investors should make more money on corporate bonds than on gilts over the long term. The corporate bond journey is much more volatile, but these bonds generate more income – which can compound powerfully over time.
Debt: The risk migration
Savers’ ‘gilty’ pleasure
But before they pile in, we believe investors need to understand the risks of holding these gilts, including opportunity cost. That 5.25% doesn’t look so attractive if you’re starting to get anxious about the government’s ability to repay the loan. That’s why institutional bond buyers are now in the driving seat ahead of the Autumn Budget. They’re telling Rachel Reeves that they’ll expect a lot more reward for lending if she doesn’t find an effective way to mend the deficit. The capital value of existing bonds on the old terms may go down rather than up if the government is forced to issue new bonds at significantly higher rates.
Not so fast…
Would you rather lend money to Rachel Reeves and the UK government or to Tesco? And how long would you be comfortable lending them money for? Which is most likely to pay it back? There was a time when most people would have replied that G7 governments are much safer than companies. If nothing else, you know the government will still be there in 10 or 30 years’ time to pay back its debt. But the answer is not so cut and dry anymore. Government bond markets have been volatile of late, colossal budgetary deficits are piling on pressure further down the yield curve and political upheaval is rife. At the time of writing, the US government is in shutdown, while France is in political limbo following a vote of no confidence against previous prime minister François Bayrou. Here in the UK, the upcoming Budget on 26 November is creating massive uncertainty and the government has backed itself into a corner of its own making with its fiscal rules. Don’t get me wrong, I believe all three governments – and Tesco – will still be operating in 30 years’ time but you only have to look at long-dated bond yields to see that the market wants a higher level of compensation for the elevated risk of lending to governments at present.
In most developed economies, fiscal looseness has been the theme of this year, with the UK the only economy to attempt prudence. But this has not resulted in UK outperformance at the long end. Quite the opposite: 30-year bond yields continued to climb to their highest levels since 1998. The bond market has judged the UK government’s plan to tackle the budget deficit as lacking in credibility – although to put this into context, the recent sell-off wasn’t much worse than for German or US bonds. Even so, fiscal sustainability remains a concern for the UK. One reason 30-year gilts are yielding over 5.5% – levels not seen since the late 1990s – is unquestionably down to a government that has made mistakes. But there are other contributing factors at play, such as inflation coming down more slowly than expected and the Bank of England becoming more hawkish as a result. There is also less of a natural buyer base for long-dated gilts as more pension funds go to buy-out, just as supply has picked up. The Bank of England continues its quantitative tightening programme, which is adding to the pressure. This isn’t all down to the ‘moron premium’.
There is, however, another driver of returns that is often overlooked: adding ‘specific risk’ via stock selection. Using detailed credit analysis to identify the most attractive assets in each pocket of the bond market can dramatically enhance the returns from making the right calls on duration and credit beta. Adding specific risk can mean that you don’t have to take as much outright duration or beta risk in portfolios to achieve the returns you’re looking for. Let’s look at a worked example. Assuming that, last November, you shared our belief that rate cuts were coming, how would you have looked to reflect that view in your portfolio?
“Companies have also been deleveraging – paying down their debt and issuing bonds at a much shorter maturity than historically. In other words, consumers and companies appear to have much stronger balance sheets than governments”
Stephen Snowden, head of fixed income
“One reason 30-year gilts are yielding over 5.5% – levels not seen since the late 1990s – is unquestionably down to a government that has made mistakes”
Stephen Snowden head of fixed income
CONTRIBUTOR
Risk and leverage have migrated from corporates and consumers to governments, according to Stephen Snowden, Head of Fixed Income at Artemis
Find out more about the Artemis Corporate Bond Fund
< PREV
NEXT >
3/3
2/3
1/3
• •
Important information FOR PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS AND/OR QUALIFIED INVESTORS AND/OR FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES ONLY. NOT FOR USE WITH OR BY PRIVATE INVESTORS. This is a marketing communication. Before making any final investment decisions, and to understand the investment risks involved, refer to the fund prospectus and KIID/KID, available in English and in your local language (depending on local country registration), from the relevant fund page or literature section on www.artemisfunds.com. The documents can also be found on www.fundinfo.com. CAPITAL AT RISK. All financial investments involve taking risk and the value of your investment may go down as well as up. This means your investment is not guaranteed and you may not get back as much as you put in. Any income from the investment is also likely to vary and cannot be guaranteed. The fund is a sub-fund of Artemis Funds (Lux). For further information, visit www.artemisfunds.com/sicav. Any research and analysis in this communication has been obtained by Artemis for its own use. Although this communication is based on sources of information that Artemis believes to be reliable, no guarantee is given as to its accuracy or completeness. Third parties (including FTSE and MSCI) whose data may be included in this document do not accept any liability for errors or omissions. For information, visit www.artemisfunds.com/third-party-data. Any forward-looking statements are based on Artemis’ current expectations and projections and are subject to change without notice. Issued by: Artemis Investment Management LLP which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority; in Germany, AI Management (Europe) GmbH; in Switzerland, Artemis Investment Services (Switzerland) GmbH.
Find out more about the Artemis Short-Dated Global High Yield Bond Fund
A European short-dated focus strategy has to buy almost 50% of the total issuers
Source: Morningstar and ICE BofA indices at 31 August 2025
Taking the example of our short-dated strategy, we believe that 100 securities is a reasonable level to get the ‘free lunch’ of adequate diversification. Most of our peers seem to believe that an efficient number of holdings is around 300 (the average is 334) . There are only 247 issuers in European high yield that have bonds with a maturity of less than 5.5 years . This probably overstates matters, as a lot of these will be illiquid or will have longer legal final maturities (for example subordinated financials).
But if we take it at face value, it means that any ‘focused’ strategy will need to buy half the issuers in existence if they exclusively focus on European high yield. The average ‘active’ high yield strategy in Europe effectively needs to buy more than the entire market of issuers. So – we like European high yield a lot because it is inefficient. But our strategy allows us to focus on finding a small subset of the most attractive bonds within this market, rather than simply buying the whole market (and effectively writing off any ability to select mispriced securities).
There is another reason why we don’t focus exclusively on Europe which has nothing to do with its advantages or disadvantages over the US, or any other market for that matter. If you focus on a single region, as 90% of high-yield funds do, you are ignoring a peculiar trait in which an international company can issue two bonds with the same maturity and from the same part of the capital structure, but that offer different yields depending upon which country they are issued in. Taking advantage of this quirk doesn’t involve taking a view on currencies – we simply hedge this risk. But even after this hedge is applied, it has been possible to earn up to 3 percentage points more over the past few years by lending to certain companies in euros rather than dollars (and vice versa)
This relationship isn’t consistent as the prices of euro/dollar bonds are volatile. But the small size of our funds and relative freedom compared with more benchmark-driven approaches let us flip between the two whenever relative valuations suit. It also shows that simple top-down allocation between different currencies won’t capture these opportunities – these only come about through bottom-up analysis. There are a number of terms that apply to both golf and bonds: hybrid, carry and recovery are commonly used in both the sport and the asset class. Well, here’s another: like a short putt that can be counted without the ball being played, we regard being able to pick up a higher yield with an identical risk as something of a gimme.
Taking advantage of regional discrepancies
The primary reason is that the European high-yield market is less efficient than its US counterpart. Not only is it smaller, it also has a more idiosyncratic group of issuers and fewer structural owners. As such, we see more mispriced securities than in the US – in terms of bonds that are both too cheap and too expensive. Given we focus on bottom-up stockpicking to jump on credit inefficiencies, it makes sense for us to allocate more capital to a market where they are more prevalent. So why don’t we just ignore the US completely? And why should a client buy our fund rather than an exclusive European high-yield one with the same bottom-up focus? The simple answer relates to concentration.
European high yield is less efficient
Sources 1. Morningstar and ICE BofA indices at 31 August 2025. 2. Morningstar and ICE BofA indices at 31 August 2025.
Not enough bonds to go around
Europe narrowly defeated the US in the Ryder Cup in September, picking up the trophy despite a spirited final-day comeback from the Americans. But golf isn’t the only area where Europe has the edge over the US – we think it is a better bet for active high-yield bond investors, too. At €600bn, the European high-yield bond market is about one-third of the size of its US equivalent and makes up just 20% of the global index. Yet it accounts for about half of our short-dated and all-maturity global high-yield funds, with this larger weighting a common thread in our portfolios over the six years we have managed money at Artemis. So why is this?
“The European high-yield bond market is about one-third of the size of its US equivalent and makes up just 20% of the global index. Yet it accounts for about half of our short-dated and all-maturity global high-yield funds”
Jack Holmes, fund manager
Our strategy allows us to focus on finding a small subset of the most attractive bonds within this market, rather than simply buying the whole market (and effectively writing off any ability to select mispriced securities)
Jack Holmes fund manager
Find out more about the Artemis Global High Yield and Artemis Short-Dated Global High Yield
Reasonably diversified portfolio
Average peer holdings
European <5.5yrs issuers
Global <5.5yrs issuers
Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results. This material contains the current opinions of the author and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material is distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. PIMCO as a general matter provides services to qualified institutions, financial intermediaries and institutional investors. Individual investors should contact their own financial professional to determine the most appropriate investment options for their financial situation. This is not an offer to any person in any jurisdiction where unlawful or unauthorized. | Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, 650 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 is regulated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. PIMCO Europe Ltd (Company No. 2604517, 11 Baker Street, London W1U 3AH, United Kingdom) is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) (12 Endeavour Square, London E20 1JN) in the UK. The services provided by PIMCO Europe Ltd are not available to retail investors, who should not rely on this communication but contact their financial adviser. Since PIMCO Europe Ltd services and products are provided exclusively to professional clients, the appropriateness of such is always affirmed. Forecasts, estimates and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be interpreted as investment advice, as an offer or solicitation, nor as the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Forecasts and estimates have certain inherent limitations, and unlike an actual performance record, do not reflect actual trading, liquidity constraints, fees, and/or other costs. In addition, references to future results should not be construed as an estimate or promise of results that a client portfolio may achieve. Statements concerning financial market trends or portfolio strategies are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are appropriate for all investors and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an investment decision. Outlook and strategies are subject to change without notice. Correlation is a statistical measure of how two securities move in relation to each other. Duration is the measure of a bond's price sensitivity to interest rates and is expressed in years. For professional use only Per the information available to us you fulfill the requirements to be classified as professional clients as defined in the MiFiD II Directive 2014/65/EU Annex II Handbook. Please inform us if otherwise. The services and products described in this communication are only available to professional clients as defined in the MiFiD II Directive 2014/65/EU Annex II Handbook and its implementation of local rules and as defined in the Financial Conduct Authority's Handbook. This communication is not a public offer and individual investors should not rely on this document. Opinion and estimates offered constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice, as are statements of financial market trends, which are based on current market conditions. We believe the information provided here is reliable, but do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. This material contains the opinions of the manager and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material has been distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. PIMCO is a trademark of Allianz Asset Management of America LLC in the United States and throughout the world. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. PIMCO is a trademark of Allianz Asset Management of America LLC in the United States and throughout the world. ©2025, PIMCO.
Explore the full PIMCO Cyclical Outlook
Gain deeper insights into how shifting global forces – from tariff impacts to the ongoing AI investment boom – may shape growth, inflation, and investment opportunities in the months ahead.
The Trump administration aims to reshape the US’s global role while improving the country’s trade balance. In previous Cyclical Outlooks, we argued that addressing these imbalances would require difficult-to-implement reforms in both the US and its trading partners. Since our last Cyclical Forum in March , the administration has enacted sweeping overhauls. The impact on the trade balance remains uncertain. However, we believe three forces – tariff effects, the technology investment boom, and challenges to institutions – will likely drive greater economic and capital market volatility within the US and globally.
Clashing forces create winners and losers: A growing tension among three macro forces – trade frictions, the AI investment boom, and challenges to institutions including the Federal Reserve – could test conventional economic and investment frameworks, drive volatility, and widen the gap between winners and losers, both in the US and globally. Delayed tariff effects begin to bite: Economic growth has been surprisingly resilient, but that appears likely to change. After preemptive actions boosted global trade flows and goods production, many countries now face a transition, with mounting pressure from tariffs and constrained fiscal flexibility. In the US, we believe the main risk from tariffs isn’t a price adjustment – it’s that unemployment could rise. The Fed and other central banks have ample room for more interest rate cuts. Tech investment provides support amid signs of weakness: Global data trends point to a weaker period ahead before targeted fiscal stimulus in some regions starts to kick in. At the same time, resilient tech investment, especially in the US and China, is poised to continue, with potentially growing effects on productivity and the labor market.
Footnote 1. About PIMCO Cyclical Forum: PIMCO's quarterly Cyclical Forum gives us an opportunity to come together amid the short-term noise to discuss the structural forces shaping the global economy and financial markets over the next year.
Economic outlook: A clash of forces tests conventional frameworks
Economic outlook: Key takeaways
Bond yields offer durable opportunities, while cash rates are poised to decline: Locking in today’s attractive starting bond yields can support strong returns and income potential in the years ahead across a variety of economic scenarios. With rates on cash-like investments likely to decline alongside central bank policy rates, we expect bonds to outperform. We favor short and intermediate bond maturities. Global diversification can enhance outperformance potential: Investors can take advantage of today’s unusual abundance of global fixed income opportunities, with attractive real and nominal yields available in a variety of countries. Diversification across regions and currencies is an effective way to fortify portfolios and harvest sources of return. Relative value can be a guide across the public–private credit continuum: The conventional divide between public and private credit is giving way to a more integrated view. We see a continuum of opportunity spanning across these markets that should be evaluated on differences in liquidity and economic sensitivity. We focus on high quality assets and see strong return potential in asset-based finance. Together, these strategies – bond yield capture, global diversification, and credit continuum analysis – can form a robust investment framework.
Investment outlook: Key takeaways
“Global growth will likely slow during the remainder of 2025 as tariff-related effects take hold”
Tiffany Wilding, Economist, PIMCO
Andrew Balls, CIO Global Fixed Income, PIMCO
“Investors can take advantage of today’s unusually attractive array of global opportunities”
Tiffany Wilding Economist, PIMCO
Andrew Balls CIO Global Fixed Income, PIMCO
CONTRIBUTORS
Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results. Investing in the bond market is subject to risks, including market, interest rate, issuer, credit, inflation risk, and liquidity risk. The value of most bonds and bond strategies are impacted by changes in interest rates. Bonds and bond strategies with longer durations tend to be more sensitive and volatile than those with shorter durations; bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise, and low interest rate environments increase this risk. Reductions in bond counterparty capacity may contribute to decreased market liquidity and increased price volatility. Bond investments may be worth more or less than the original cost when redeemed. Commodities contain heightened risk, including market, political, regulatory and natural conditions, and may not be appropriate for all investors. Statements concerning financial market trends or portfolio strategies are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are appropriate for all investors and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Outlook and strategies are subject to change without notice. Performance results for certain charts and graphs may be limited by date ranges specified on those charts and graphs; different time periods may produce different results. It is not possible to invest directly in an unmanaged index. CPI, or Consumer Price Index, measures the average change over time in the prices paid by urban consumers for a market basket of consumer goods and services. The S&P Hopes and Dreams Index, calculated by Cameron Crise from Bloomberg, tracks the remaining percentage of market value unexplained by the book value and the net present value of the next three years of earnings estimates for the companies. The J.P. Morgan Hawk-Dove score assesses central bank communications to estimate monetary policy tendencies. The nominal neutral rate (often called r* or r-star) is an estimate of an interest rate that neither stimulates nor hinders economic growth. The Yield-to-Worst on the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index represents the lowest potential yield an investor could receive on a bond from the index, without the bond defaulting. The 10-year U.S. Treasury inflation-indexed yield is a daily rate representing the real yield on Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) with a 10-year maturity. The 10-year German Bund inflation-indexed yield represents the real yield of Inflation-linked Federal bonds (ILB) with a 10-year maturity. This material contains the opinions of the manager, and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material has been distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. PIMCO Europe Ltd (Company No. 2604517, 11 Baker Street, London W1U 3AH, United Kingdom) is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) (12 Endeavour Square, London E20 1JN) in the UK. The services provided by PIMCO Europe Ltd are not available to retail investors, who should not rely on this communication but contact their financial adviser. Since PIMCO Europe Ltd services and products are provided exclusively to professional clients, the appropriateness of such is always affirmed. PIMCO is a trademark of Allianz Asset Management of America LLC in the United States and throughout the world. ©2025 PIMCO Europe Limited. All Rights Reserved.
Read more insights from PIMCO
The balance of risks to the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate (price stability and maximum employment) prompted the central bank to lower its policy rate in September in an effort to bolster the economy and employment. However, US inflation remains above the Fed’s target and is elevated relative to global peers.
We expect additional rate cuts, but not down to the near-zero levels that could rekindle high inflation. Well-anchored inflation expectations likely inform Fed decisions at least as much as current prices and recent trends do. Thus far, tariff-related price pressures do not appear to have significantly affected inflation expectations.
Monetary policy walks the inflation tightrope
Indeed, the US equity market has remained both buoyant and bullish, but how much of this is froth? Investors are getting little additional earnings yield by owning equities, versus what they would earn owning a nominal 10-year Treasury note. This suggests that bonds may offer better risk-adjusted returns in the current environment.
Bullish sentiment has returned to equity markets after a tariff-related dip: Stock prices don’t signal recession, but how much of this is froth?
But while stock markets appear optimistic and inflation expectations seem stable for now, higher policy uncertainty has kept yields on 10-year Treasuries elevated. The difference between 10-year US Treasury yields and the nominal neutral rate has risen above the levels signaled in Fed communications. This gap suggests the market is pricing in more risk for the long term. This could put upward pressure on long-term interest rates. It also signals elevated uncertainty about future inflation and growth.
Market pricing reflects expectations for long-term uncertainty
In late 2024, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index yield rose above the Fed’s policy rate for the first time in more than a year and has stayed there – emphasizing the compelling starting point for bonds now. It was extraordinary to have a benchmark bond yield running below – sometimes well below – the policy rate. Prior to the pandemic, this had happened only four times in this century. Fixed income offers an attractive opportunity with high starting yields. Historically, bonds have performed well across a range of different rate-cutting scenarios, and downward moves in bond yields have tended to follow cuts in the Fed policy rate.
A long-term trend has reasserted itself: Benchmark US bond index yield exceeds the Fed policy rate
Looking beyond the US, another long-term trend has returned during the post-pandemic recovery period: The yield on German 10-year inflation-indexed Bunds (or “linkers”) has remained in positive territory for nearly two years, after more than a decade below zero. Linker yields still significantly lag the inflation-indexed yield on US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS). TIPS yields have been hovering around 2% since 2023, but previously had been lower – even negative – in the low-inflation environment that followed the global financial crisis. Higher inflation-indexed yields are another signal that fixed income may be an attractive, risk-aware investment in today’s uncertain macroeconomic environment.
Market signals in German and U.S. inflation-linked bonds
Source: Haver Analytics and PIMCO calculations as of August 2025. For the 25th–75th percentile, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) was used for Australia, Canada, Japan, U.S., China, India, Brazil, South Korea, Mexico, Indonesia, Israel, Turkey, Russia, Egypt, Poland, Philippines, Vietnam, Colombia, Hungary, South Africa, and Thailand. The Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) was used for Ireland, Germany, France, Belgium, Finland, Italy, Netherlands, Greece, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, U.K., and the euro area.
9%
8%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
2025
U.S.
Global median
Euro area
Global 25th–75th percentile
Global core CPI inflation
Source: Bloomberg data and PIMCO calculations as of August 2025. Equity earnings yield is 1-year forward earnings divided by the price of the SPX index. Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results.
9.0%
7.0%
5.0%
-1.0%
-3.0%
1997
1998
2000
2002
2004
Equity earnings yield less 10-year treasury yield
Source: Bloomberg data and PIMCO calculations as of August 2025. The Hawk-Dove score assesses central bank communications to estimate monetary policy tendencies. The nominal neutral rate (often called r* or r-star) is an estimate of an interest rate that neither stimulates nor hinders economic growth. The nominal rate is calculated using the Laubach Williams measure. Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results.
30
25
20
15
0
-5
-10
-1
-2
-3
-4
Hawk-Dove score (LHS)
10-year Treasury yield – nominal neutral rate% (RHS)
Fedspeak vs. the gap between 10-year US Treasuries and the neutral rate
Hawk-Dove score
%
Hawkish
Dovish
Source: U.S. Federal Reserve and Bloomberg as of September 2025. Yield-to-worst is the estimated lowest potential yield that can be received on a bond without the issuer actually defaulting. Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results.
4
1990
1995
Yield-to-worst on Bloomberg US Aggregate
Federal funds rate
Yield-to-worst on the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index versus the fed funds rate
“Tariff-related price pressures do not appear to have significantly affected inflation expectations”
“While stock markets appear optimistic and inflation expectations seem stable for now, higher policy uncertainty has kept yields on 10-year Treasuries elevated”
Richard Clarida Former Federal Reserve Vice Chair, Global Economic Advisor, PIMCO
